(November 20, 2009 at 4:53 pm)rjh4 Wrote: No doubt there would be an explanation for such data being thrown out. I would predict this myself. Scientists always try to explain data that doesn't look like predicted. Had to do it for plenty of lab work in college. Doesn't always mean that there was something wrong with the sample or equipment, though. It could be a systemic problem with the method.That's why you take different measurements with different samples and different equipment. I notice you have ignored my challenge. Please find me one example (just one) and I will take a look.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 4, 2024, 5:03 am
Thread Rating:
|
Radiometric Dating
|
 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Radiometric Dating - by littlegrimlin1 - November 20, 2009 at 2:00 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by chris - November 20, 2009 at 4:17 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by rjh4 - November 20, 2009 at 9:39 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by theVOID - November 21, 2009 at 12:30 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by lukec - November 26, 2009 at 8:35 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Darwinian - November 20, 2009 at 10:00 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by rjh4 - November 20, 2009 at 10:56 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Darwinian - November 20, 2009 at 2:13 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by rjh4 - November 20, 2009 at 2:57 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Tiberius - November 20, 2009 at 11:48 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by rjh4 - November 20, 2009 at 12:27 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Minimalist - November 20, 2009 at 11:53 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Tiberius - November 20, 2009 at 2:48 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by rjh4 - November 20, 2009 at 4:53 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Tiberius - November 20, 2009 at 10:43 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Minimalist - November 26, 2009 at 12:32 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by littlegrimlin1 - November 21, 2009 at 11:18 am
RE: Radiometric Dating - by downbeatplumb - November 21, 2009 at 1:52 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by littlegrimlin1 - November 27, 2009 at 12:41 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by Minimalist - November 27, 2009 at 2:45 pm
RE: Radiometric Dating - by littlegrimlin1 - November 28, 2009 at 2:20 am
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Scientific Dating | Blondie | 22 | 4615 |
October 21, 2015 at 7:30 am Last Post: Cyberman |
|
| [split] Radiometric Dating | Creatard | 92 | 19346 |
November 26, 2014 at 8:40 am Last Post: Cyberman |
|
| Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) | orogenicman | 7 | 3348 |
November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm Last Post: orogenicman |
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
