(November 20, 2009 at 9:39 am)rjh4 Wrote: If you want to read more on radiometric dating, I found this article in the past few days. This article presents the problems with radiometric dating and references to support those positions (not all of which are creationist in origin). Based on the reasoning provided in the article, I do not know why anyone would trust it. But then again I am biased. Read for yourself though and see what you think. It is long but comprehensive.
Radiometric Dating
The same author has an article on the
Geologic Column
and
Fossil Record
Again to me the argumentation along with the evidence presented is convincing to me that a recent global catasrophic event produced the fossil record and the geologic column, not millions/billions of years. But, again, I am biased. Read for yourself. Look up the references. See if what you have been taught all these years still makes sense.
If a single global event killed them all then find me a human being next to a Cambrian fossil! It's an utter nonsense idea, the global flood. Do you actually not realize that the egyptian built several pyramids during this supposed flood? Don't you find that really fucking impressive? I'd love to see an egyptian build a pyramid in the largest flood in existence! Maybe they also arranged the species fossilized into chronological layers of strata all over the globe while they weren't busy building fucking pyramids inside a few thousand feet of water!
.
