RE: Soul
April 2, 2013 at 11:30 am
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2013 at 11:40 am by Tex.)
The only thing I'd like to add to Chad's post is that the quantities aren't only thoughts, but also truly exist within our universe outside of our own thoughts. Otherwise, he got what I'm trying to say pretty well.
I bother because many people deny the auxiliary immaterial brain supplement. You guys are like flat world-ers to me. Plus, there are other immaterial things to speak of, and I'd figure the atheist crowd, generally also being the more intelligent crowd, would feel more at home if I dealt with numbers before other immaterial stuff.
whateverist Wrote:I hadn't been thinking of James Brown but there certainly are better meanings to attach to "soul" than auxiliary immaterial brain supplement. This is such a reach and really so pointless. If that is all you can think to make of a 'soul' then why even bother?
I bother because many people deny the auxiliary immaterial brain supplement. You guys are like flat world-ers to me. Plus, there are other immaterial things to speak of, and I'd figure the atheist crowd, generally also being the more intelligent crowd, would feel more at home if I dealt with numbers before other immaterial stuff.
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
