(April 3, 2013 at 1:26 pm)festive1 Wrote: No, but if you would care to enlighten me...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXiU6kiq_Ms
Were I a scientist, I'd be sure to get right on that. Oh wait, everyone is.
Wikipedia Wrote:Alternate measures of sexual orientation
The Kinsey Scale does not address all possible sexual expressions. Others have stepped forward to define it further. In 1980, Michael Storms proposed a two dimensional chart with an X and Y axis.[11] This scale took into account the case of asexuality and the simultaneous expression of hetero-eroticism and homo-eroticism.[12] Fritz Klein, in his Klein Sexual Orientation Grid, included factors such as how orientation can change throughout a person's lifetime, as well as emotional and social orientation.
Kinsey, Storm, and Klein are only three of more than 200 scales to measure and describe sexual orientation.[13] For example there are scales that rate homosexual behaviors from 1 to 14, and measures for gender, masculinity, femininity, transsexualism and attitudes towards contraceptives.[14][15]
This is from the same Kinsey scale link you posted earlier.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein_Sexua...ation_Grid
Even in this there are things not measured. Kinsey scale itself could certainly benefit from a wording change, considering the implications behind 'predominantly'.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
