(November 23, 2009 at 6:32 pm)Saerules Wrote:Certainly. I don't base my appreciation nor ally myself with people who focus on being only 'likable' or 'popular'. I see myself as an ally with those who are not only deep thinkers, but passionate ones as well. A philosophy acquaintance of mine once said "If you are not passionate about something, you're not as deeply interested or affected by it."Syna Wrote:I like people who articulate their thoughts carefully and react strongly to tone. That said, add another beam of support for Sae. And I never saw "Male tone", unless you count making ones point as overtly male. Personally, I see it as a sign of strength to hammer ones point home.I'm not sure I understand...Do you mind restating this more clearly for me?
"Male Tone" is suggested to be forceful and aggressive. I claim that I've not seen an abundance of said tone, and current appearances of said tone in writing instead tell me that you fight for your position. I appreciate a fighter.
(November 23, 2009 at 6:32 pm)Saerules Wrote: (Dotard runs into the shower and begins scrubbing knowing he will never ever feel 'clean' again.)You do realize, Dotard, that most likely some of the pictures you've wanked off to had a transsexual in it? Might I ask if that is really such a problem, as the vision in your head was already separated from reality?
Feh - it matters not. What lies in the mind's eye is in the beholders interests, it matters not in daydreams the matters of real flesh. Thats why they are daydreams.
