RE: Proving God Existence
April 6, 2013 at 2:42 am
(This post was last modified: April 6, 2013 at 2:51 am by Muslim Scholar.)
(April 4, 2013 at 2:28 am)Severan Wrote: Assuming that G is the cause for all matter,It is not an assumption, it is a conclusion
Quote:G would have an infinite number of outcomes,What do you mean by that?
Do you mean possible actions? OK
Possible actions are not real, an action is real only when it is done
So they are not infinite
God's (real actions) are finite.
Quote:therefore G would be all powerful. FALSE: Nothing can be omniscient. This can be proved by a paradox. THEREFORE: G is NOT the cause for all matter.as the premises are false this conclusion is false as well
(April 2, 2013 at 5:52 pm)pocaracas Wrote:That's why I did not use the full definition of time(April 2, 2013 at 2:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: My definition is much better; why?Clearly, you don't know what a dimension is.
because it is a partial definition of time
It is accepted by all people
The universal definition of time, is not even definite or agreed on.
So just analyzing the sequence of events is better than using the whole definition of time which is not universally agreed on.
Time is a dimension. That's the universal definition of time.
It is a special dimension along which all other 3 spatial dimensions move in a fixed direction, but a dimension nonetheless.
And if you start with a faulty concept of something so basic, how do you expect to arrive at a proper conclusion?
Using only part of the definition of time is a key in this proof
I did not prove that time had a start
I proved that events did
and proved also that the first event must be singular
Forget about the complex definitions of time and dimensions
We (an no one) knows exactly what is time or even a dimension is!
Quote:Then what did you define it as? I read a finite series of elements, when you wrote " All Statuses separated from (1/1/2000 00:00:00) by a finite number of seconds "Set 1 is clearly finite
but it is finite because the nature of its elements.