If I'm right, you go to hell, if I'm wrong, no loss 
*angerily asserts pascal's wager*
I kid I kid
I think we are getting repetitive. I will do more research on the issue, specially, this whole you don't need to factor in natural selection for direction of A system to B system.
I'm not sure about this issue.
It's in fact very hard to present, because generalizations usually are not true.
While Michael Behe argues it's not an argument from ignorance, I will say on my end, it is an argument from ignorance, hence not reliable or 100%.
Michael Behe of course maybe doing it out of knowledge of biology, because he is very well aware of the counter arguments out there.
*angerily asserts pascal's wager*I kid I kid
I think we are getting repetitive. I will do more research on the issue, specially, this whole you don't need to factor in natural selection for direction of A system to B system.
I'm not sure about this issue.
It's in fact very hard to present, because generalizations usually are not true.
While Michael Behe argues it's not an argument from ignorance, I will say on my end, it is an argument from ignorance, hence not reliable or 100%.
Michael Behe of course maybe doing it out of knowledge of biology, because he is very well aware of the counter arguments out there.
