RE: God's God
April 9, 2013 at 4:37 pm
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2013 at 4:38 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(April 9, 2013 at 4:18 pm)median Wrote: The Argument from Ignorance/Incredulity fallacy is supposed to be "reasonable"?? LOL.Actually, my presentation of the cosmological argument has nothing to to with inserting entities into an area of unknown. Quite the opposite. I made a deduction from what is already known.
(April 9, 2013 at 4:18 pm)median Wrote: Can you read? If you didn't see any then you haven't been paying attention. Merely claiming "God [the supernatural self propelling causer of the universe] is necessary" isn't an argument. It's an unsupported claim, which anyone can do.Apparently you missed, ignored, or do not read at a high enough level to understand my earlier post. Any reasonable person can see that my belief in a necessary being is not an unsupported claim, despite your unsupported claim that my claim is unsupported. (That was fun to write)
The Post You Missed...