God's God

[Neo-Scholastic]

You cannot present an argument for something as vague as a featureless "supreme being" because that is not what your religion teaches.

How childish can you be? Since you cannot easily refute the argument for a genetic supreme being, you move the goal post to prove a very specific deity.

Your religion teaches that a very certain and specific Supreme Being exists and the onus is upon you, maker of the positive claim that your god exists, created the universe, and all other claims are false and blasphemous, to prove it.

Now you are just acting like a bully. I have proved what I wanted to prove. Atheism is not a rational choice.

You cannot prove that adherents of other religions are not having false visions or delusions, even though your dogma insists that this is true.

Boy, you’re making an awful lot of assumptions about my religion in order to avoid the discussion at hand. What makes you think my religion teaches that all other revelatory experiences are delusionary? God reaches out to people wherever they are belief-wise.

Since there is no other demonstrably true explanation for what Godschild claims to have experienced, and what he claims to know is true, labeling it a delusion is the only intellectually valid thing to do.

The only intellectually valid thing is chose the an equally unconfirmed explanation you prefer. And you dare to accuse others of confirmation bias? You’re acting hypocritically.

---

It is more than comedy that you think infinities cannot be real (prove it!)

And yet you want me to prove the existence of a deity you claim is not real even though you cannot prove the existence of an actual infinity. Apparently there's one set of rules for believers and another atheists.

yet you think your God is actually infinite. HA! Once again, if you can claim your deity is infinite (an infinite disembodied mind?)

Did I say anything about an infinite god? For that matter did I propose any secondary attributes to the supreme being?

The fact that multiple answers can be given mathematically, when using infinities, does NOT in anyway demonstrate that actual infinities are not possible.

So you can believe in actual infinities despite, the logical inconsistencies such a belief produces, because its possible. But I'm not allowed to believe in the possibility of a god that is in no way inconsistent with the known universe. You guys really think you can have it both ways.