RE: God's God
April 10, 2013 at 12:33 pm
(This post was last modified: April 10, 2013 at 1:15 pm by median.)
(April 10, 2013 at 12:21 pm)Tex Wrote:Ryantology Wrote:I believe in nothing which is not supported by verifiable physical evidence, and my conclusion is a result, not a cause.
What is the verifiable physical evidence that leads you to believe that you should only believe what can be supported by verifiable physical evidence?
As usual, you apologists love to miss the actual meaning of a statement and instead jump to attack anything foreign. There are plenty who hold that statements are not "things". Like numbers, their ontological status has not been defined. Thus Ryan could very easily be talking about believing in actual "things". Didn't look at that one before you leaped, did you? Statements are only as good as what is meant by those statements.