God's God

[Tex]

Reading an archeologist (or few), who also believe(s) like you, isn't - in any way - sufficient to justify belief in the supernatural (this is why, elsewhere, we've said your standard of evidence is way too, hypocritically, low). Textual accounts of the miraculous, whether from yesterday, yesteryear, or 2000+ years ago are also not sufficient to establish that a violation of known physics occurred. Claimed supernatural events are extraordinary claims. They require MORE than just textual "I said so" hearsay accounts - not less (Read your bible! Mark 16, John 14, John 10). They are not sufficient to establish that ANY extraordinary phenomena occurred. Would you accept, "on faith", my personal 'testimony' (in written form) that I have a pet fire-breathing dragon? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Again, your standard of evidence is extremely low (and hypocritical because you want to smuggle in your presumed and interpreted religion, but push out the rest). You have a double standard problem, a spin problem, and a gullibility problem.

I mentioned nothing about the supernatural or Jesus or dragons or faeries or any thing else. I was thinking more on the lines of Mayans and Incas.