God's God

[median]

No I would not accept that as enough evidence to convict.

It would make the police search for evidence that supported your though.

As you yourself pointed out there are a number of different scenerios that could have led to the deaths.

The verdict was guilty, you are trying to change what happened, answer the question that arrived from the story. You need to stop making up your own questions and giving answer to them, that's dishonest.

LOL. This is just about as much comedy as your bible fiction. So basically, you've concocted a story (and from the outset) tried to force us into agreeing with your (non-real) story. And now you are trying to ask us why we "agreed" with you in the story??? Could you GET anymore irrational? Your story commits the fallacy of begging the question (as well as the fallacy of complex question). We don't buy that Person X would have been convicted on your personal testimony alone. That is the point Mr. Gullible. Sorry. It's really sad that you can't see this.

Btw, if a jury did ever convict a man of murder on one person's dying testimony alone (and that's a big IF) I would say they made a big mistake! In fact, they would have made a huge mistake JUST LIKE THE MISTAKE YOU ARE MAKING WITH YOUR RELIGION! You don't "know" there was eyewitness testimony of some 'Jesus of Nazareth' who supposedly rose from the dead. You assume! Just like you're assuming that some fictional jury convicted a man of murder on one persons testimony alone. It's fallacious (and gullibility based) reasoning.