(April 12, 2013 at 1:14 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(April 12, 2013 at 12:41 pm)Undeceived Wrote: Evolution was based on physiological observations--organisms "looked" similar, so some scientists decided there must be some causal relation. Evolution died when scientists discovered that many of the organisms (Darwin's finches, for example) were entirely different species and far apart on the hypothetical Evolutionary tree. But that hasn't stopped Atheistic scientists from pursuing a new version of the theory. They began drawing causal relations from an organism's genes instead. But there remains the biggest presupposition: that similarity implies causality.
Similarity does imply causality, at least at the level we've discovered. We've got the indisputable genetic data, but if you want more, there's the comprehensive fossil record charting the evolutionary lineage of organisms, and the instances of speciation we can observe under laboratory conditions. When you can literally watch evolution happening, your baseless denials kind of fall by the wayside, Undeceived.
You think I haven't researched this? Provide me with some transitional fossil examples and laboratory evidence of macroevolution.
