1984 & A/S/K revisited

[downbeatplumb]

Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. There can be more than one way to explain and interpret the present facts. How do you choose? By presupposing. Creationism also explains the facts.

scientific theory
Web definitions
a theory that explains scientific observations; "scientific theories must be falsifiable".
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

The idea of creationism is not falsifiable because it relies on the impossible deity so does meet the criteria.

I can make up any old shit to explain things that fit the facts.

But to have a chance of being true they must also have evidence for them.

I could say invisible pxies punch creatures into new shapes in the egg/womb so that they develop into the "right shape" or I could say that tabitha from bewitched has made herself immortal and wiggles her little nose to make the animals the way she wants.

These explain the facts but are wrong they also have as much evidence for them as creationism.

You attack evolution because:

A: You don't fully understand it. It is a complex ever developing theory which is one the most exciting in modern science, which when appreciated is amazing.

B: You really want it to not be true.

But what you have missed is that even if evolution was wrong (which it isn't) it would not be evidence for creationism.

That is why you focus on destroying evolution, (and piss poor you are at it too), your beliefs have not factual basis that you can point to, Creationism no proof at all.