RE: Wearing a crucifix
November 23, 2008 at 6:51 pm
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2008 at 9:20 pm by Jason Jarred.)
(November 20, 2008 at 1:27 pm)Daystar Wrote: The Roman cross had a variety of shapes, from a simple pole to a cross shape or X shape. It was a phallic symbol. A representation of the penis worn around the necks of many.I ain't wearing no penis around my neck!
Ankle...fine, but neck? Nooooo! :p
(November 20, 2008 at 3:27 pm)bozo Wrote: I find it mildly provocative. It is a statement of faith ( or fashion I admit ). If it is of faith, then that is provocative as far as I am concerned. I don't go round with any visible sign of my atheism.Using popular Christian logic, I could say that not wearing anything that symbolises a religion is in itself symbolic of Atheism. I know I know, bald is not a hair colour, no need to tell *me* that!
(November 22, 2008 at 12:15 am)FaithvsEvidence Wrote: I have no evidence that jewelry is beneficial, and until we can prove it with the scientific method I will refuse to wear jewelry.Hmmmm, clothes aren't beneficial in the warmer weather.
God forbid, I hope we don't see you running around naked come summer. What would your fellow church goers have to say about *that* little display?
(and by 'little' I am in no way implying....wait, never mind)
Atheism as a Religion
-------------------
A man also or woman that hath a Macintosh, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with used and abandoned Windows 3.1 floppy disks: their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20:27
-------------------
A man also or woman that hath a Macintosh, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with used and abandoned Windows 3.1 floppy disks: their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20:27
