RE: Kalam Cosmological Nonsense
April 14, 2013 at 2:36 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2013 at 3:10 pm by median.)
(April 13, 2013 at 12:43 am)cato123 Wrote: Median,
What the fuck is your problem? You used LOL in two consecutive posts suggesting you are hip and saving digital space. Then, we are treated to a 2000+ character cut and paste job. When the fuck did integrity become a bad word?
The reference is there, before the article. There is no plagiarism b/c I haven't acted as if the article is mine. I simply re-posted it with the link, in adding to the OP.
p.s. - I never claimed or suggested to be attempting to "save digital space". If you don't like the post no one is forcing anyone to read it.
(April 13, 2013 at 8:52 am)John V Wrote: WTF are you talking about? The fact that a person came to belief for certain reasons does not make them intellectually dishonest for discussing other reasons that one might believe.
Likewise, a former theist can say "I lost my faith due to X," and yet discuss reasons for losing faith other than X.
You're either intellectually dishonest or just plain dumb for making the charge.
Strawman, what was that charge again exactly? Having a hidden agenda is certainly dishonest (which he had no problem accepting after the "in a minute" comment was made). And instead of providing solid evidence for this alleged disembodied mind behind the universe it was just "Oh, I'll just leave now." And my rebuttals were not the only one's posted toward these assertions. Still waiting for the demonstration of the alleged supernatural...
(April 11, 2013 at 7:34 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: All you do is call me a liar. It gets old.
And yet again, another lie - demonstrating (not just claiming) that the point is true. There have been far more things stated and rebutted here then just "calling you a liar" - including the rebuttals to your alleged God thing-behind the universe argument (by myself and others) - which you refused to respond to.
"All I do"?? NOPE.
