(April 18, 2013 at 10:02 pm)paulpablo Wrote: If you can't explain how god does anything you can't tell me that he can't be a creature and be a god, you can't tell god what he can't do.You are mixing between science and logic
You need to take all of theses examples back to its roots
If the problem is unknown science then it may happen (for example a flying horse or stick into snake, etc.)
But if the problem is a logical contradiction/paradox then it cannot happen (even by God himself) because it is based on your definition of terms
For example turning stick into a snake is unknown
but being a stick and a snake at the same time is impossible (because we defined the terms "Snake" and "Stick" and they are mutually exclusive)
Quote:But I think the root of the problem is that you're using logic to prove the illogical.No, I'm using logic to prove the impossibility of the Illogical.
Quote:So you don't know that he can't effect light either, its a total contradiction.It goes back to our definition of Image (i.e. a light reflection of an object)
As God is not an object then an (according to our definition) image of him is impossible.