I pick all of them.
1) Format is (Passage just before Crucifixion)/(Passage of burial) - (answer1)/(answer2)
Luke 22:7/Luke 23:54 - Day of Unleavened Bread/Day of Preparation, Mark 14:12/Mark 15:42 - Day of Unleavened Bread/Day of Preparation, Matthew 26:17/Matthew 27:62 Day of Unleavened Bread/Day of Preparation, John 18:28/19:31 - Near Passover/Day of Preparation
I see nothing overly complicated that needs explaining.
2) This one is a bit more tricky. I went looking and looking for the answer, and never found it. There is no answer here. Luke is wrong. Luke 2 has Quirinias for the birth and then its 29 A.D., so Jesus is a max of 23 and he's starting his ministry (which Luke says is about 30). Luke had to have flubbed a number in his math or something and then oopsied with the ruler from there. If he simply didn't carry the one, it puts Jesus at 6 B.C. rather than 6 A.D., fitting with Luke's account much better.
3) Sometimes Jesus speaks, sometimes he didn't. John mentions the times he did. Matthew has him silent most of the time. Mark and Luke both mix it up. I don't even understand what the issue is.
4) None of these contradict either. The text of the angels isn't exact, but pretty much means the same thing. All the rest is either info omitted or included that the others don't have. That omitted info seems pretty trivial. The accounts are never really that different. The women show up, see, run back, and tell the guys.
5) All accounts have Jesus crying out at the very end. "It is finished" and "into your hands I commit my spirit" have the same meaning. At the very least, these have no relevance to Christian teaching. That last cry in any account didn't need to be anything special. All accounts are geared toward a specific audience or for a specific purpose. Mark is just relaying the story and telling facts. Matthew is specifically for the Jews, scripture references everywhere, prophesy stuff everywhere, genealogy, etc.. Luke is for the non-Jews, genealogy of Jesus to Adam, few Jewish references, etc.. John is communicating Jesus is YHWH. He wants that clear. His book isn't even in chronological order.
1) Format is (Passage just before Crucifixion)/(Passage of burial) - (answer1)/(answer2)
Luke 22:7/Luke 23:54 - Day of Unleavened Bread/Day of Preparation, Mark 14:12/Mark 15:42 - Day of Unleavened Bread/Day of Preparation, Matthew 26:17/Matthew 27:62 Day of Unleavened Bread/Day of Preparation, John 18:28/19:31 - Near Passover/Day of Preparation
I see nothing overly complicated that needs explaining.
2) This one is a bit more tricky. I went looking and looking for the answer, and never found it. There is no answer here. Luke is wrong. Luke 2 has Quirinias for the birth and then its 29 A.D., so Jesus is a max of 23 and he's starting his ministry (which Luke says is about 30). Luke had to have flubbed a number in his math or something and then oopsied with the ruler from there. If he simply didn't carry the one, it puts Jesus at 6 B.C. rather than 6 A.D., fitting with Luke's account much better.
3) Sometimes Jesus speaks, sometimes he didn't. John mentions the times he did. Matthew has him silent most of the time. Mark and Luke both mix it up. I don't even understand what the issue is.
4) None of these contradict either. The text of the angels isn't exact, but pretty much means the same thing. All the rest is either info omitted or included that the others don't have. That omitted info seems pretty trivial. The accounts are never really that different. The women show up, see, run back, and tell the guys.
5) All accounts have Jesus crying out at the very end. "It is finished" and "into your hands I commit my spirit" have the same meaning. At the very least, these have no relevance to Christian teaching. That last cry in any account didn't need to be anything special. All accounts are geared toward a specific audience or for a specific purpose. Mark is just relaying the story and telling facts. Matthew is specifically for the Jews, scripture references everywhere, prophesy stuff everywhere, genealogy, etc.. Luke is for the non-Jews, genealogy of Jesus to Adam, few Jewish references, etc.. John is communicating Jesus is YHWH. He wants that clear. His book isn't even in chronological order.
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
