RE: Atheism, Theism, Science & Philosophy
April 22, 2013 at 3:02 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2013 at 3:25 pm by Love.)
(April 22, 2013 at 2:42 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I could rephrase the second bit but I doubt it would help. I've been asking you to make a case for whatever supplements you prefer rather than constantly droning on about the limits of reason since the beginning. It's been fruitless. Let me try one of my favorite lines. Reason is not only limited in scope, but it's trash, absolute garbage-theres no sense in hammering in on it's limits because it's been removed from consideration, now tell me how I -ought- to be doing this, make that case.
Right, well I have not been "droning on"; instead of wasting your time making disparaging remarks, concetrate on the point you are trying to make. I have been addressing questions and would mention the "limits of reason" if it was relevant to the point that I was endeavouring to make. If you could have articulated your point more clearly, I could have addressed this earlier.
It is absolutely impossible to communicate any proposition via the use of textual language without reason. Reason dominates all forms of communication between humans beings, regardless of the communication medium that is being utilised to express any particular concept. Therefore, the conditions upon on which you insisted are ridiculous.
