RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
April 24, 2013 at 2:02 am
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2013 at 2:04 am by Cinjin.)
Why bother Min? Between Tex, John V, GChild, and Stat, it's a giant cluster-fuck of pathetic excuses and/or outright avoidance. It doesn't matter what the Babbly book says, the gymnasty responses are always the same: Context, metaphor, and translation. They refuse to see that their dumbfuck god doesn't even have the power to keep his translations straight or his authors mathematically competent, let alone keep his own followers from splitting into hundreds of different sects - all disputing the interpretations of a "perfect book."
How anyone could possibly take that stupid book seriously is just .... well ....
![[Image: fucktardsig_zps825f0e56.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk619%2Fjcincain%2FPublic%2Ffucktardsig_zps825f0e56.jpg)
oh and by the way. Which one of you is right? Is it you Tex? Is your church the right interpreters or should I go with those True Christians down in Westboro? How bout the Ku Klux Klan? Do they have it right? What a pathetic joke of god you all serve.
How anyone could possibly take that stupid book seriously is just .... well ....
![[Image: fucktardsig_zps825f0e56.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk619%2Fjcincain%2FPublic%2Ffucktardsig_zps825f0e56.jpg)
oh and by the way. Which one of you is right? Is it you Tex? Is your church the right interpreters or should I go with those True Christians down in Westboro? How bout the Ku Klux Klan? Do they have it right? What a pathetic joke of god you all serve.