RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
April 25, 2013 at 11:45 am
(This post was last modified: April 25, 2013 at 11:51 am by Minimalist.)
Quote:Even if what you assert were true, which doesn’t appear to be the case at all
You claimed that Quirinius was a procurator, Waldork. He was not. I see that as an a typical example of your shoddy excuse for scholarship. I just want you to know that I will pounce on your sorry fucking jesus-loving ass for every fuckup you make.
(April 23, 2013 at 3:53 pm)John V Wrote: What you miss is that the two passages are given at different points in the chronology, with the 800 at a later point than the 300. So, both could be accurate.
Personally I tend to think that the numerical differences are more likely due to copying errors which have no effect on doctrine. But in this case, you don't even have a solid numerical difference due to the time factor.
You are out of your fucking mind, Johnny. I understand the desperation but when even the bible thumping translators cross-reference these two passages you clearly have your head way up your ass.
Quote:Without news reports from the front all numbers would be final tallies after the event. You are complicating things.
They have to. Otherwise their fucking holy book looks like the pile of shit that it actually is.
