(April 28, 2013 at 4:17 pm)Tex Wrote: Tex Wrote: But the evidence isn't required. I've given examples and then they demand physical evidence when the topic is immateriality...
ME wrote "A thing which has no physical evidence cannot be considered more than imaginary."
Where is your physical evidence? You have been operating on this principle that you can't prove for a while now. Prove it. Hurry up. I'm tired of your dogma. Right now, you're no better than a bad catholic.
Physical evidence that there cannot be considered more than the non-existence of physical evidence. Do you have a definition of "immateriality" which is physical. If so would you care to post it?
