Conflicting statements in the bible

[Statler Waldorf]

I will take your poorly thought out excuse fact. The OTHER children which you think you were clever to invent, living outside the garden, had already been expelled from the garden for no know reason.

What on Earth are you talking about? Genesis 5:4 clearly states that Adam and Eve had more kids later on. John V didn’t invent anything.

Care to explain how the Jews and the Christians missed you version until Saint Augustine the sex hater invented the original sin story?

Augustine didn’t invent original sin, it’s clearly taught in scripture by Paul.

How do you expect to be taken seriously when all of your (lame) responses are all predicated upon young earth creationism?

I believe that those whom he wants to take him seriously do take him seriously. I for one do not care whether someone who is ignorant enough to think that a blue whale, a bacterium, a mosquito, and a human are all blood relatives takes me seriously or not, in fact I’d be a bit worried if they did.

Sorry to break it to you but it never happened. ALL FOUR of those people are myths. You are trying to explain away contradictions in stories about people and events which never occurred written by unknown people at unknown times for unknown reasons

You’re really getting desperate aren’t you? First you claim there are contradictions in scripture and then when that claim gets destroyed you resort to tossing out fallacious red herrings like the one above. Keep things relevant and defend your original claim that there are contradictions in scripture.

Speaking of being dropped upon one's head ... how stupid can you get?

Why are you personally attacking him? He’s been destroying you in this debate, so calling him stupid only makes you look even worse.

The bible has a very obvious contradiction, creation itself.

What is logically contradictory about the idea of creation?

As with so many things when you point that out the believers try to distract us, an usually are really distracting themselves debating the validity of which bloodline and why both are correct.

They are both correct; Matthew refers to Jesus’s blood line through Mary while Luke is referring to Jesus’ bloodline through his adopted father Joseph. A person can have two different genealogies, one on their mother’s side and one on their father’s side? Imagine that!

Sorry believers HERE is the one and only bloodline of Jesus for Christians, MARY. God has no blood. Mary was the only human involved. QED

Jesus was adopted by Joseph, therefore he has two genealogies.