(May 4, 2013 at 1:26 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: In the OP, I have shown that the validity of empirical observations presupposes divine influence. It is irrational to demand empirical evidence if you disavow the principles that justify knowledge acquisition by means of empirical observation.
Chad,
I think you have yourself tied in a knot here. You most certainly have not shown that empirical observations 'require' a divine influence. You asserted earlier that inductive reasoning and atheism were mutually exclusive concepts. You haven't shown this either.
