Proving God Existence

[Muslim Scholar]

Homo sapiens first appeared c. 200,000 years ago. Islam wasn't invented until 1,400 years ago. By my math, that makes somewhere in the neighborhood of 198,600 years in which nobody could possibly have been born a Muslim.

ِAdam the first human was Muslim, Islam did not invent Islam he only continued the revelation that was brought by other prophets (Noah, Moses, Jesus, etc.)

---

You've not won me over and I'm sure you'll tell me that I don't understand but here's why. To say that this starting event must be outside of the universe isn't axiomatic. The nature of the physics in play at that start is so mysterious that our understanding is nowhere near advanced enough to draw conclusions. Stripping it down to a simple sequence of events is far too closed minded.

The proof is dependent on logic not science

Even if that is the case, the force outside of the universe could be anything. Assuming it to be a god is jaded.

The name God is not proved, it is the characteristics of the first events/doer
You can call him anything.

---

1 how can you prove what is impossible or possible for god?

God's ability is not bounded by science but a logical paradox is impossible because it is defined like that
It is like saying "Can God create nothing"
Nothing is opposite to existence so it cannot be created, it is not related to power but related to our definition of the term.

2 I already told you I had a mental image an animal wearing victorian clothes and talking to me, this never happened and is not a memory.
When I was a virgin I had several sexual mental images of me having sex, yet I still remained a virgin because these things were not memories.

Still an image from memory (its parts)

3 My proof as I have already told you that not all images are reflected light is that people can all be in the same room and see different images, hallucinations exist.

Hallucinations are memory images.

4 there is no concept about god which is generally accepted, what do you mean people who are addressed by this proof?

Who accept the premisses
"Disjoint cannot exist"