RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
May 7, 2013 at 10:41 pm
(This post was last modified: May 7, 2013 at 10:45 pm by A_Nony_Mouse.)
(May 7, 2013 at 4:18 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(May 6, 2013 at 9:28 pm)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote: We can't do controlled fusion in the lab so theists need to come up with a new explanation for the sun being hot.
Fusion is a natural process that we can deal with in the present, therefore it’s dealt with by the empirical sciences, abiogenesis is a theory of origins that is not based upon any known natural process. It never ceases to amaze me just how much blind faith atheists have when it comes to the origins of life.
How does not understanding one process differ from not understanding the other process? Are you claiming life is an unnatural process?
The origin of life is hardly an issue. It is not covered by any known religion rather claims the world was created as it existed at the time of writing the story. That is not a theory. That is bullshit.
![[Image: bovine-4.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.giwersworld.org%2Fimages%2Fbovine-4.gif)
There are living things and non-living things. There is nothing in living things which is not in non-living things. Where else could life come from? Frankly it is an observation of fact not a theory.
Even the great god Amun created the first man and woman out of clay and breathed life into them. Clay is not alive.
