I love that dazzn has spent several pages making wild claims without sourcing them or otherwise backing them up, and instead resorts to the age-old piss-poor debate tactic of saying "prove what I say doesn't happen".
No. Burden of proof. Go read about it. Your claims, your responsibility to present a proof. When you've done that, then it's up to your opponents to prove you wrong (or accept your claims as valid), but only then.
No. Burden of proof. Go read about it. Your claims, your responsibility to present a proof. When you've done that, then it's up to your opponents to prove you wrong (or accept your claims as valid), but only then.
