(May 16, 2013 at 6:18 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: You can believe whatever you want dude, and you can tell yourself that an infinity is easier for you to understand than a circle-square is and I can believe that you think that because you want an infinity to be true. The fact is, none of our opinions mean shit here because none of it correlates with reality or our observable universe, so until we have some rational foundation for such speculation, its just irrational reasoning that supports its probability.I take it, that was directed at me?
My views are most aligned with naturalism than idealism, although the difference between the two is subtle. Although I use a lot of precepts from idealism, such as the power of language. That does not mean that I think an internally contradictory concept such as a 'married bachelor' or a 'square circle' exists. There I default to naturalism: What can be observed and understood as a part of Nature.
I do not think "infinity to be true" nor that "infinity is easier for you to understand than a circle-square" are true. I merely expressed that they are possible to be written in text using language.
I don't see what part of my posts implied that.