(May 17, 2013 at 1:06 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: Waldorf, how I can destinguish a jar that holds trancendent magical dice that exist, from a jar that holds trancendent magical dice that do not exist.
Experiment 2:
Distinguishing a jar that has regular dice that do exist, from a jar that has dice that do not exist. Do you see any difference in either of these experiments?
It’s a faulty analogy. We are not discussing the existence of some little magical invisible creature that can exist in one jar but not the other. We are talking about the transcendent, immaterial, omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, Creator God. The existence of this God makes your jar experiment even possible. Our ability to gain knowledge through experience is only made possible by God’s existence.
(May 17, 2013 at 4:05 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Well it isn't populated with gods and demons and little guys with pitchforks, asshole.
I never said that it was, gramps.
(May 16, 2013 at 11:13 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Christians do not have a monopoly on epistemology.
Anyone can postulate a theory of knowledge, you’re right. However, only the Christian theory of knowledge is logically consistent.