Conflicting statements in the bible

[Statler Waldorf]

It's exactly what morons like you believe. As if you beliefs matter at all.

I do not believe that multiple gods exist, nor do I believe any supernatural being is running around with a pitch fork. How can you argue against a position you so clearly do not understand?

Oh! A faulty analogy. That must be the case. I was flipping pages through my book of "common responses from theists once backed into an illogical corner"...I must have skimmed right over that one. My apologies...ah yes! Here it is on page 59: "any analogy that depicts belief in God as illogical is a Faulty Analogy" I'll try to find something you'd be willing to accept.

You were trying to treat an omnipresent timeless being as a being extended in space and time; that by definition is the fallacy of the faulty analogy. I am growing weary of having to teach you basic rules of logical reasoning.

No it isn't.

Sure it is, try postulating a theory of knowledge that is logically consistent that does not require God to exist. Texas Sailor already tried and failed, can you do any better?

...it's consistently circular and illogical (Christianity)

No, if a theory of knowledge and view of reality is logically consistent and has any component that is known to be true, then the entire system must also be true. I find it interesting you brought up circular logic though considering you’re the one who had to invoke it to establish your memory and senses are reliable. :-P