Conflicting statements in the bible

[Statler Waldorf]

Name calling? It's an accurate description.

You have some growing up to do.

You're evil for thinking that. Tell me, how long should Stalin be punished for his crime in this imaginary Hell of yours? 100 years? 1,000? Maybe we should keep score for how long each life, so each life killed becomes "adequate" to punishment received. But wait, even after, says 20 million lives times whatever amount of years per life murdered, he's gonna continue his immortal existence in Hell. That's me some "justice" right there.

Crimes against an infinite authority necessitate an infinite punishment, makes sense.

Says you.

And is necessitated by logic.

Well that point went straight over your head.

No it didn’t, he said he didn’t feel the need to rape children, but the only reason he doesn’t feel that need is because of God’s upholding grace.

It's morally wrong because they don't consent to being molested, hence the word "molestation".

That’s not a syllogism, much less a sound one. Care to try again? Why is it morally wrong to violate someone’s consent in an atheistic Universe?

Nice try again; he was postulating something a theist would say, but I reckon you wouldn't want to lie now? I expect nothing less from such an evil douchebag like yourself.

How do you know I am evil? Why is it morally wrong to lie in a Universe that has no God? You’re just confounding your problems my child.

Which is why you're evil. And I won't flinch in calling you evil.

Why am I evil? How do you define evil?

Actually, never deconvert - because the only reason you're not out murdering, raping and pillaging, I reckon, is because you fear your imaginary Hell and not because you think it's wrong to do so, but because God tells you not to - not that you'd even be able to realize this Euthyphro dilemma.

O’ brother; Euthyphro’s dilemma? Seriously?

Pure speculation, with only religious masturbation to back it up.

No, a logical deduction from an infallible source. Trump card!