Nothingness

[Violet]

You don't have to repeat your nonsense.

It would seem that I do, given how you didn't understand it the first time.

It's not mythical. If you think it is, then I dare you stand in front of an incoming train.

I've done so many times. Sometimes the trains split along the center, sometimes I am thrown out of the way, sometimes I die.

Perception. You still haven't told me how it applies to existence, of course. Didn't you know? Trains aren't real because they don't perceive

No one has ever perceived an electron AFAIK, yet gazillions of them are hitting your screen as you are reading this.

Are they? How about you demonstrate this?

Sigh... don't be a retard. You perceive with more than your eyes. Unless you happen to be deaf, unable to taste, unable to feel, unable to smell, and unable to think. Then I guess you would only perceive with your eyes

And what's your point with this pathetic demonstration? I can teach you calculus, differential geometry, and quantum field theory. I'm not impressed by your juvenile display.

What, it's not obvious? Okay... calclueless applies... where? To what? In what way(s)? Differential geometry applies... where? To what? In what way(s)? Quantummy field theories apply... where? To what? In what way(s)?

Good on you for having the slightest mastery over some of the most pathetic mathematics in the universe... but you don't seem to have mastered the basics even remotely... so I'm not sure what good it'll do you. 'I'm not impressed by your infantile display'

I wasn't, hence your misperception, misundertanding and faulty reasoning.

That's good... no idea where the last 3/4ths of that is coming from though, since it doesn't follow Not that you're likely aware of what that means, but hey: a lady can hope.

There are not the same. "You're a liar". The form pertains to the words and symbols making up that sentence; the content pertains to what it describes, which is either true or false.

They're not the same, form is a part of content. You can read, yes? Of course, they are also probably the same, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that things we recognize as different might infact be one and also different. I'm telling you only truths, regardless of your insistance

The form is a part of what content describes. That is to say: The content of any particular chair includes its form. The content of the idea of a chair includes its form.

"Which is either true or false?" Throwing the law of the excluded middle out there when LOGIC ITSELF is but a thing... ahh, how myopic.

Can your little head comprehend this elementary lesson, or am I talking to a twit?

I'm rather bigheaded, ask anyone around here, and they'll set you straight. Given that you haven't given me a lesson, but more an anger-induced tirade, I would suggest you attempt to rephrase your "lesson", as a rather smart person does not understand it due to serious failures in its presentation, which might leave such a person to believe that it was not so much a 'lesson' for her, but for the one who wrote it to look back upon later, and maybe learn something about themselves by hindsight.

You put the 'wit' in 'twit', sir.