Refuting Evolution

[Dragonetti]

---

Look at it this way: most harmful mutations didn't propagate to the whole species and, since only less than 1% of the species population becomes a fossil, the odds of finding such a fossil are extremely low.
You practically only get fossils from members of the established population.... the ones that got some beneficial mutation.
Here's a nice link to start learning about it: Fossilization processes

do you really believe this BS????

Do species have a protection system to deny non-beneficial mutation?
Yes, and it is very intelligent

If Evolution is not-intelligent non-sense, non-beneficial mutation must outnumber beneficial ones, by a very great number
It would be almost impossible not to find them in the fossil record.

Think again and clean your brain from this BS.

---

In addition as proved time itself had a start which means that that the universe state U(0) was not a function at all it was either nothing or a constant; taking Limit as t-->0 U=C or U= 0

Asserting that U(0) was either nothing or a constant is incorrect. U(0) is technically undefined, mathematically speaking, as there is no possible state of U such that there exists a U(t) which is equivalent to your hypothetical interpretation of the meaning of U(0). Since the rest follows from assuming that U(0) is defined and has a value, the rest is simply wrong. Even if your assumptions were valid (they aren't; see uniformitarianism), your make-believe mathematical interpretations aren't correct either physically or mathematically.

I didn't assert anything, as I gave the possibility that U(0) may be 0 i.e. nothing, then it is mathematically (and logically) true.

It is like saying God=G where G >=0
this is an axiom (i.e. always true)

---

We share 58% of our genome with bananas, believe it or not. (Theists are near 100%).

When we are more than half banana, then it sort of hits home how closely related that everything is.

This means that the same God created us and Bananas

---

Muslim Scholar I say to you.
1.Can you refute the existence of "endogeneous retrovirus" that Humans have in common with monkeys and primates ?
2.Can you refute that humans have 99% of DNA in common with chimpanzees ?
3.Can you refute that horses can't make a hybrid with a zebra ?
4.Can you refute that lions can't make a hybrid with a tiger ?
5.Can you prove that humans was made with clay (with others sources than religious sources) ?

Irrelevant
Remember that I don't reject Evolution
I reject stupid (non-intelligent) one only.

[/quote]

---