Why can't you approach it like that? What's so hard about giving your definition of a word(you already did so no need for you)? Don't you see how unwelcoming it is and haugty it is to stand up on your scientific pedestal and wait for an opinion that differs from yours, that is unverifiable, and lob bombs at it when all that's asked was a simple question (albeit poorly worded). Not that it hasn't been done to many atheists over the years but I don't do that and I don't feel it's very humane (read christian 
) to act in such a manner. Do scientists (christian and non) just try and use subjective evidence to prove their point or do they just try and disprove others? Eliminating variables is fundamental to science, I understand, but there's no need to have such a condescending attitude about it. I get enough grief because I'm white in a black neighborhood. I get charged a white tax at the locally owned convience store. Discrimination is discrmination and a warped perspective doesn't help anyone.
) to act in such a manner. Do scientists (christian and non) just try and use subjective evidence to prove their point or do they just try and disprove others? Eliminating variables is fundamental to science, I understand, but there's no need to have such a condescending attitude about it. I get enough grief because I'm white in a black neighborhood. I get charged a white tax at the locally owned convience store. Discrimination is discrmination and a warped perspective doesn't help anyone.
