(May 26, 2013 at 11:47 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Sure, no argument - but the subject of that particular part of the discussion was the jury's verdict, not whether it represented truth. The point was that the jury was certainly an appropriate authority to consult as to what the jury's verdict is. That's it. You're reading way more meaning into what was said than what was there.
Yeah probably, I do that a lot. *high five* *group hug*