RE: Think Tank
May 27, 2013 at 10:22 pm
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2013 at 10:31 pm by That guy who asked questions.)
(May 27, 2013 at 2:00 am)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: Serious response: more orgies.
F YEAH!!!
(May 27, 2013 at 4:00 am)Gilgamesh Wrote: De-industrialise the world. Law would have it so licenses and vehicles would be a lot more difficult to get, as well as vehicles only seeing use on needed out-of-town trips. There's no reason every citizen needs to own their own vehicle and there's no reason vehicles should be used (abused) to travel within the same town.
Can you please explain how stepping back in progress would make a positive effect? I'm not trying to be asinine I just really don't understand the reasoning behind this. Maybe I'd understand better if I knew what area you live in, because vehicles are crucial where I live and so is productivity. When you live in the south and a person's job is more than likely about 20-50 miles away from the person's home it would be very hard to get to work, but I don't fully understand your concept at the moment. Maybe if you elaborate I can see the positive outcome.
Sal, very good concept I think, but I do have one suggestion. Instead of funding nuclear fission why don't we fund more free-energy alternatives. There have been several prototypes of self-sustaining electromagnetic motors capable of producing 40x the energy it consumes. If we mass-produced devices like this it would be a huge benefit to all society because it seems that the places that suffer the most are mostly due to lack of energy and water. I think self-sustaining free-energy is a much better alternative than nuclear energy which has a possible horrific potential, whereas clean free energy has no negative effects.
I used to pray... but then I realized I could talk to myself and save 10% too. Who wouldn't go for that?
