RE: Think Tank
May 28, 2013 at 4:41 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2013 at 4:42 pm by Gilgamesh.)
(May 27, 2013 at 10:22 pm)That guy who asked questions Wrote: Can you please explain how stepping back in progress would make a positive effect? I'm not trying to be asinine I just really don't understand the reasoning behind this. Maybe I'd understand better if I knew what area you live in, because vehicles are crucial where I live and so is productivity. When you live in the south and a person's job is more than likely about 20-50 miles away from the person's home it would be very hard to get to work, but I don't fully understand your concept at the moment. Maybe if you elaborate I can see the positive outcome.Getting rid of cars/de-industrialisation is not a step back, if you're looking to preserve the planet you live on, that is.
You wouldn't need to rely on a vehicle to get to work because you wouldn't be working that far from where you live in a de-industrialised world. Also, there's buses and bikes. Not every person needs their own vehicle. Maybe a couple vehicles per neighborhood and people just carpool.
Your mind has been too warped by society.
(May 28, 2013 at 7:01 am)festive1 Wrote: So not de-industrialize, rather invest in public forms of transportation and infrastructure for such (rail lines, bus lanes, etc.), right?But also de-industrialise.