Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 14, 2025, 8:02 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The technological singularity - inevitable?
#9
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable?
I am familiar with Kuirzweil.

You say he is trying to live to singularity? What a sad, and probably frightened old man.

Just to represent the other side of the argument, I will show you mine.

I like being human, and will take no further steps towards cybernetic integration. Would you accept (or pay for) a microchip that monitors blood pressure? Would you accept a microchip that adds "telepathy"? I would do none of these things. I don't want to integrate more with tech, I see tech as already killing me. I want much less tech. You talked to Rabbit about how our lives are so improved by tech, and I think you are looking through a bit of tunnel vision. To say there not no negatives would be a misnomer, and I think there are far more negatives to modern tech than positives.

Feel free to call me a technophobe, or someone in fear of the future, but I will disagree.

I will defend my right to make my own choices, and I choose to be as human as possible, and not a cyborg. I also wouldn't accept farmed body parts, wear a RFID with financial uses (or any use) or and kind of tech modification to my own living organism. I might consider wearing glasses, but I wouldn't get a pacemaker. I know some people don't understand, and think that to say I don't want wireless computer devices in my body is like saying I won't wear glasses. There is a perceived flaw that anything that came before me is OK, and anything new is scary, that would be legitimate future-phobia... But I am saying that there is a difference between the selective breeding of wheat, and the genetic manipulation. I would support selective breeding, but not the manipulation.

So just to show you that there are people who think Kuirzweil is full of crazy talk, here I am. I would not amend my human person in any technological way. I would defend myself from such invasions, and if it were forced upon me I would asses the possibility of ceasing my pseudo-life (if the computer would let me). If you think you will end up some superman if you have little computers live for you, good luck. I think you are missing what it is to be human, and ignoring glaring risks of such choices.

Thanks,
-Pip
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The technological singularity - inevitable? - by theVOID - December 6, 2009 at 1:08 am
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by theVOID - December 6, 2009 at 4:37 pm
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by theVOID - December 6, 2009 at 7:47 pm
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by theVOID - December 12, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Taking whisfull thinking for The Future - by Purple Rabbit - December 13, 2009 at 5:32 am
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by Pippy - December 12, 2009 at 10:04 pm
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by theVOID - December 12, 2009 at 11:07 pm
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by Tiberius - December 12, 2009 at 10:17 pm
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by Violet - December 14, 2009 at 12:33 am
RE: The technological singularity - inevitable? - by lrh9 - December 14, 2009 at 12:08 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)