(June 2, 2013 at 5:03 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:(June 2, 2013 at 12:03 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: So your goal is to force non muslims under the sharia! And you clearly use the word force. If so, then there is a case to be made against you, since making a claim to power on the grounds of using violence is illegal in almoust every democracy.Yes, but can you prove the democracy is right?
Muslim are obligated to concur all countries, then force Islamic law on them (No Homosexuality, No iterest) even religions, only Christians and Jews will be allowed to practice their religions in Public, others can but in privacy, and all are not allowed to invite people to their religions.
How is that good?
If you assume that Islam is the true religion then restricting other religions will make more people into Islam (i.e. saved)
Quote:So you clearly say that you want to fight non believers.Yes, it is not me it is Islam
and fighting means on the country level not individuals
Muslim countries (when in power) should invite other countries into Islam or Gizia or War
If they accept Islam then they rule themselves
If they accept Gizia, they will allow Muslim to promotes Islam freely inside their countries and not to fight against any Muslim country (a kind of treaty)
Or War
That is Islam; like or not it doesn't matter and it doesn't affect its validity as well because it is consistent.
(June 1, 2013 at 8:11 am)orogenicman Wrote: All arguments for god(s) fail the bullshit test because belief in said god(s) depends on faith, and faith is, after all, a belief in something not in evidence.My proof is not dependable on any faith, just in logic!
If that is the case, then you are screwed.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
