(December 17, 2009 at 10:24 am)Eilonnwy Wrote: Rjh4, you're moving the goalpost.
I don't think I did any such thing.
(December 17, 2009 at 10:24 am)Eilonnwy Wrote: I have provided sources...
Yes...to something that wasn't even close to answering the questions I asked. Anyone can do that.
(December 17, 2009 at 10:24 am)Eilonnwy Wrote: If you want to refuse the science behind the explanation of our solar systems, then stop using your GPS, cell phone, satellite TV, etc... Obviously, they don't work.
Do you even read my posts? Or do you just assume that anyone who questions scientists' conclusions regarding origins must hate all science? I guess your world view does not allow for someone to have no problem with operational science and still disagree with the extrapolations to historical science as it relates to origins. Oh well...continue to spout such ridiculous statements if you wish.
Void,
Thanks for you post. I think I understand your answer to my question but I do not think everything is as well settled as people portray it here. Furthermore, it all still does seem to require the materialistic and uniformitarian presuppositions I mentioned before which are unproveable (which you did not appear to deny but instead appeared to justify....I am not complaining/arguing here just noting. I still think everyone has presuppositions that they use to interpret the world and that is where the differences in thinking come in. Once we recognize these, it makes it easier to understand another's point of view.). So while it has certainly not changed my view of things I do appreciate the exchange and I may have more questions for you in the future.