RE: Childhood indoctrination
June 7, 2013 at 9:41 am
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2013 at 9:43 am by KichigaiNeko.)
(June 7, 2013 at 8:48 am)NoraBrimstone Wrote: The smell of bacon makes me feel all nauseous.
It's all in the genetics Nora. That is my point.
Anglo-Saxon raised as a vegan and was (at age 18) introduced to bacon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3fc2/f3fc2579e2035c9958c98177e8a214a54d969e6d" alt="Dunno Dunno"
This is further to my point, should yourself or anyone else find that a vegan/vegetarian diet suits your particular metabolism and genetics all kudos to you. Vegan/vegetarianism is NOT a panacea and there are many who are unable to partake of such a diet for mainly genetic or metabolic reasons. That said it is childish and futile to (by way of guilt/ ad populism) argument to say that vegan/vegetarianism will "cure the world"! It won't and many would die (and are dying) as a result.
For me the world is a wondrous amazing place and I am part of this thing called living. I do not strive to set myself above it nor to dictate how it should work.
(June 7, 2013 at 9:17 am)Rhythm Wrote:(June 7, 2013 at 2:32 am)Forbinator Wrote: Thanks for your post. I guess as long as we have a monetary system, humanity is screwed? That sounds about right, but let's not make innocent animals pay for our mistakes.LOL, as long as we have a monetary system at least some of us are going to be screwed, yes (not really the fault of ag tho). It isn't just that animals (including ourselves) "pay" for our economic policy- we also "pay" for our technical inability, and perhaps even more than either of the first two we "pay" for the limits of organic chemistry. So long as livestock are capable of processing commodities which we are not (for whatever reason, be it economics or biology) their presence in a food production system will always mean "more food" than would be available in their absence. Until we find a better nutrient source than either the livestock themselves or petrochem (in this regard we could simply find a better way of distributing said resource in the short term..but this would only forestall the same problem..as it is consumed at a greater rate than it occurs by any process that we are aware of) we will be beholden to one or the other.
I noticed in one of your responses that you aren't comfortable conceding that additional fertility (that is, additional to what is naturally occurring) is required - if you would like me to link you a commercial agricultural production manual (for a region with nutrient rich soils) I would be more than happy to oblige. Fertility is required, it does not occur in great enough amounts/density naturally, and it doesn't care whether you or I are comfortable with that - in fact it simply doesn't care at all...it's just chemistry.
Just curious Rhythm, do you anything about the soil structure of Australia?
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5