(December 17, 2009 at 10:57 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Ray Comforts 'know' is very different to scientific 'know'.. and you know it!
I have 'absolute knowledge' of my own belief. What you're continuously doing is superimposing 'evidence' where it's never invoked. Atheism isn't the disbelief in the existence of deities, just the lack of belief in deities. (c'mon I deserve a +1 for that! )
Perhaps I should change my religious views to "Militant Theist: I can't know and neither can you."
And isn't that the same as saying "I'm militant about not knowing"? What's wrong with the strength of that position?
I did notice that you capitalize Agnostic and am prepared to grant you that.
Saying you're gnostic about about the fact that you believe is meaningless. Of course people know what they believe. It's about being intellectual honest and stating that you claim to have knowledge about what you believe or not.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :odcast:: Boston Atheists Report
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :odcast:: Boston Atheists Report