(June 11, 2013 at 2:33 am)fr0d0 Wrote: My objection is that it (the wikipedia article) missed the point.
The Wikipedia article didn't miss any point. It states it how it is; Calvin said there is a thing called the sensus divinitatis which gives us knowledge of the divine. I have objections. The result? The content of the OP.
Quote:The point being the biblical reference Calvin bases his (common) assertion on, which I alluded to.
Yes, and your remark, as I stated, was a specific case of what the sensus divinitatis would be capable of.
Quote:Go ahead and state your case. I'm just saying that the basis here is unfounded.
You're commenting on the thread where I've stated my case.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle