Thanks for that 
You are crazy, please keep your rose coloured glasses away from me. I have made a few points as to why I dislike modern Pharma, and I think they stand. Argue my points, not you opinion of them. Did Baxter knowingly release HIV tainted material? Did they ship live bird flu virus accidentally (although I have also shown that is is almost impossible for that to be an accident)? Did they or did they not? Should they be held accountable or not?
Does the drugging of children make you feel safer? Is it healthy to give them chemical drugs to make them better fit into modern society? I think it is the absolute lowest form of profiteering. I'm glad you have more credibility that the average citizen. Good for you. I have the most credibility to myself, and I would thank you not to assume that I should have to listen to you foremost. I will make up my own mind, use my own grey matter to come to my own conclusions. You do the same. I am happy to discuss though.
Do you agree with the "No medicine, or bad medicine" thing? I mean, that comes off as a little crazy to me. Enabling abhorrent behavior from the industry. You have cited my lack of information, please if you will inform me yourself. Is the information I have posted, the facts on which I base my opinions, lacking? Is there a moral imperative to drug children? Is Baxter not breaking the highest of human moral code? As per the article, are not almost every Pharma corp and their subsidiary being dragged through court? I do think there is a positive, in that the courts kind of work. but they need to revoke business charters and also use the billions in settlements to help the victims of the crime.
I mean, by all means call me cray and uninformed, but please point it out lest it become petty name calling.
I mean bottom line, drugs are bad, aren't they? Especially unnecessary mood altering drugs.
Thanks,
-Pip
You are crazy, please keep your rose coloured glasses away from me. I have made a few points as to why I dislike modern Pharma, and I think they stand. Argue my points, not you opinion of them. Did Baxter knowingly release HIV tainted material? Did they ship live bird flu virus accidentally (although I have also shown that is is almost impossible for that to be an accident)? Did they or did they not? Should they be held accountable or not?
Does the drugging of children make you feel safer? Is it healthy to give them chemical drugs to make them better fit into modern society? I think it is the absolute lowest form of profiteering. I'm glad you have more credibility that the average citizen. Good for you. I have the most credibility to myself, and I would thank you not to assume that I should have to listen to you foremost. I will make up my own mind, use my own grey matter to come to my own conclusions. You do the same. I am happy to discuss though.
Do you agree with the "No medicine, or bad medicine" thing? I mean, that comes off as a little crazy to me. Enabling abhorrent behavior from the industry. You have cited my lack of information, please if you will inform me yourself. Is the information I have posted, the facts on which I base my opinions, lacking? Is there a moral imperative to drug children? Is Baxter not breaking the highest of human moral code? As per the article, are not almost every Pharma corp and their subsidiary being dragged through court? I do think there is a positive, in that the courts kind of work. but they need to revoke business charters and also use the billions in settlements to help the victims of the crime.
I mean, by all means call me cray and uninformed, but please point it out lest it become petty name calling.
I mean bottom line, drugs are bad, aren't they? Especially unnecessary mood altering drugs.
Thanks,
-Pip
