RE: Attn: Christians, We've Heard Them Already
June 12, 2013 at 1:49 pm
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2013 at 2:00 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(June 12, 2013 at 10:52 am)John V Wrote: I don't know from this whether anything I say will be new to you, and you only want new content.
Try me. I dare you.
EDIT TO ADD: Just for your convenience, here is a summary of the coherent and thoughtful arguments I've heard against my post:
Quote: ...So if you can come up with an intelligent counter-argument other than the one I just quoted above, you're good. Go for it! Do it for Jesus!
Quote:Can you show how you determined objectively that religion is a net detriment to society? Seems to me that would be impossible to calculate.
That's a lengthy thread topic which I may get to next.
Quote:And again, if you did beat a single Christian, that means just that - you beat a single Christian. Hooray for you, but it doesn't mean you've debunked the argument.
And as I keep challenging you, pick up the gauntlet and succeed where this other Christian failed.
Do it for Jesus!
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
