(June 13, 2013 at 5:27 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(June 13, 2013 at 4:59 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Stat, why do you claim that scripture is infallible?
Because it has to be.
What is the fine if God is unable to live up to the lofty expectations you hold him to? And how are you going to impose that fine given all his omni powers. He has got to be faster than a speeding bullet so just forget about popping a cap in his ass.
(June 13, 2013 at 5:27 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:Quote: How do you know that?
Because denying that truth leads to a view of reality that is logically inconsistent and incoherent.
Does the inconsistent and incoherent you complain of reflect an aesthetic disagreement with your own druthers only, or are we talking about ripping open the fabric of space and time? Exactly what is at stake as you see it if permit such blatently inconsistent and incoherent suppositions into our equations?
(June 13, 2013 at 5:27 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:Quote: What infallible method did you apply to arrive at that conclusion?
I didn’t arrive at that conclusion; it’s the starting point that allows me to properly arrive at all other conclusions.
Have I told you lately how much I like it when you just come out and cop to shit many theists wouldn't say in a million years.
