(June 19, 2013 at 3:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Your statement is too general
to refute a proof you need to point which part of it exactly fails, then prove it is a failure or it is only probable
I'm too busy right now, but I can sum it up:
-your axioms, specifically the definition of time, are too speculative to be treated as axioms. If we were to debate, I'd ask you to prove that time is what you think it is.
-your conclusions do not follow from your axioms. I can accept a Prime Cause as a philosophical conclusion based on your ideas about time. I cannot accept that it must be Allah.
-your "solution" (i.e. God) is special pleading. You allow an entity to embody those characteristics by which you refuted any other idea of existence.
I'll try this weekend to make a more exhaustive list. I also challenge you to a 1 vs. 1 debate if you are willing. As a declared agnostic, you should find it easier to convince me than the physical monist atheists here, methinks.