@Synackaon:
The responses here were reasonable in context in my opninion.
I'm assuming the people here took the story on face value,which is what I did.This is a news story,about some woman in the US whom I did not know or care about.The story was from a source to which I afford little credibility (IE; an internet forum) from an even less credible original source..
MY comments referred only to the behaviour of the EMTs AS REPORTED, which was indeed appalling in my opinion.
I make no equivocation and attempt no speculation about the woman or her circumstances because they are irrellevent to the issue. There is only one issue with which I'm concerned;the behaviour of the professionals who SEEM to have failed in their duty to the point of criminal culpability. The final decision rests with professional review and the legal system, not the court of public opinion.
By 'concerned' I actually mean 'mildly interested'. I have now reached the outer limit of my interest.
The responses here were reasonable in context in my opninion.
I'm assuming the people here took the story on face value,which is what I did.This is a news story,about some woman in the US whom I did not know or care about.The story was from a source to which I afford little credibility (IE; an internet forum) from an even less credible original source..
MY comments referred only to the behaviour of the EMTs AS REPORTED, which was indeed appalling in my opinion.
I make no equivocation and attempt no speculation about the woman or her circumstances because they are irrellevent to the issue. There is only one issue with which I'm concerned;the behaviour of the professionals who SEEM to have failed in their duty to the point of criminal culpability. The final decision rests with professional review and the legal system, not the court of public opinion.
By 'concerned' I actually mean 'mildly interested'. I have now reached the outer limit of my interest.
