(June 20, 2013 at 7:24 pm)Ryantology Wrote: You basing everything on what's written in a work of ancient fiction based upon tales and myths told by word of mouth for centuries before they were committed to paper and edited countless times since, a narrative with no consistency or demonstrable basis in reality. You think that makes you better than Drich, who swears by the efficacy of revelation? I'm sorry that I assumed you were a Christian.
I do not base my beliefs off of any such work; I base them off of the infallible word of God. If you’re going to assume scripture is not the word of God a priori, then I have every right to assume it is the word of God a priori, fair is fair.
Quote:I can't, until I corroborate the information with other people and until my claim is thoroughly tested and verified. In many cases, that does not lead to the truth, but it does put one as close to it as we can possibly get. Until then, I have nothing even close to knowledge.
How do you know that you have collaborated with other people and tested the information? Did you not perceive this collaboration and testing also through your senses?
(June 20, 2013 at 7:24 pm)Rationalman Wrote: What Maelstrom said: he is a dick
How does it prove that?
