RE: Proving God Existence
June 26, 2013 at 8:49 am
(This post was last modified: June 26, 2013 at 8:54 am by Muslim Scholar.)
(June 23, 2013 at 8:09 am)paulpablo Wrote: If G is a single event outside time then this contradicts G having actions, plural. More than one action is more than one event and is therefore not singular.I didn't claim that G have plural actions
This may be true after the first event only.
The first event must be singular from one source, this is the idea
(June 23, 2013 at 8:12 am)bennyboy Wrote: 1) S1 is infinite (may be true or false)Any expression is either true of false
2) S2 is finite (may be true or false)
3) S3 is an empty set (may be true or false)
But making these boolean is wrong, because that's not what sets are.
Can you prove otherwise?
Quote: What you really should have is ST (Set of all Time), a set which may have zero members, finite members, or infinite members.This is the original assumptions but it can be short cut by assuming that it can be with zero member or more (the other 2 states)
Quote:As an aside: I'm not sure why you keeping using the value Φ, aka the Golden Ratio, which is approx. 1.618 and is often used by theosophers to represent a kind of mathematical truth in the universe, when you apparently mean an empty set, Ø.Yes this was just typo, I mean the empty set.